Applying Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 in Financial Remedy Cases

by Kidd Rapinet on November 1, 2023
Separated couple hugging

The primary goal section 25 is to ensure that the financial settlement is fair and just

 In the realm of family law, determining a financial and property split within divorce proceedings can present its challenges. Whilst it is a fundamental requirement for the purposes of achieving fairness, for the Judge to preserve wide powers of discretion, the family courts in the United Kingdom rely on a framework set out in Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. This statute sets out the criteria that the courts must consider when deciding the appropriate financial and property settlement.

Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973

Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 establishes a comprehensive framework that guides the court’s decision-making process in financial remedy cases. The primary goal of this section is to ensure that the financial settlement is fair and just, taking into account the unique circumstances of each case. It is essential to understand the key elements of Section 25, which the court considers when making its decisions:

  1. Resources of the Parties

The court considers the present and foreseeable financial resources to include the savings, investments, property, and income and mortgage capacity of each party. This includes consideration of any disparity in income and the potential for any increase in future earnings.

  1. Financial Needs during/after divorce

The court considers the present and foreseeable financial needs, to include housing, retirement and income needs of each spouse. These are assessed in the context of the standard of living enjoyed by the parties and children during the marriage.

  1. Childcare Responsibilities

The court examines the parties’ childcare responsibilities, including the age and needs of any children and the extent to which these responsibilities may affect their earning capacity.

  1. Standard of Living post-divorce

The court considers the standard of living enjoyed by the family during the marriage and whether it is reasonable and /or possible to maintain that standard post-divorce.

  1. Ages of both divorcees

The ages of both parties are considered, particularly in relation to their future earning capacity and retirement plans.

  1. Duration of the Marriage

The length of the marriage is considered when determining financial remedies. A longer marriage can create a greater financial inter dependancy and financial obligations than a shorter one.

  1. Health of both divorcees

The physical and mental health of the parties, as well as any disabilities or special needs, which may influence the financial settlement.

  1. Financial Contributions in a marriage

The contributions made by each party to the marriage, both financial and non-financial, are carefully weighed. This encompasses homemaking and childcare responsibilities, and what career sacrifices may have been made by either spouse impacting their income capacity, as well as taking into account direct financial contributions.

  1. Conduct during marriage

The conduct of either spouse when it would be inequitable for the court to disregard it. This conduct would normally have a financial relevance.

  1. Pensions

The Court will consider the value of any benefit which one spouse will lost the benefit of acquiring upon the divorce. This is a direct reference to pensions and the loss of a widows/widowers pension, upon death.

Applying Section 25 in Practice

When applying Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the court has wide discretion and aims to arrive at a fair and just outcome. The court may also consider other relevant circumstances, such as pre or post-nuptial agreements, and whether a court should impose the settlement agreed, within such a document. It will not do so unless it is within the parameters of what a court considers to be fair and reasonable. The court can also consider whether a spouse is cohabiting or is about to remarry and the financial impact of this, on their needs and resources.

It is important to note that the court’s decisions are not formulaic and must be tailored to the factual matrix of each case, and the overarching objective is to provide a fair and equitable financial settlement that meets the reasonable needs of both parties and any dependents.

This article was brought to you by Kidd Rapinet Maidenhead’s family solicitors. You can book an appointment with any of the family lawyers across our other offices in Aylesbury, Canary Wharf, Farnham, High Wycombe, Maidenhead or Slough, using the form provided.  Please use the links provided to find more information on divorce or separation, child arrangements and other areas of family law.

These materials and content have been prepared for the benefit of their viewers/readers. They are intended for marketing purposes only and are of a general nature and do not constitute legal advice applicable to any particular facts or circumstances. Kidd Rapinet LLP and/or the author(s) accept no duty of care, responsibility or liability for any loss or damage which you or any third party may suffer as a result of any reliance or use by you or them of these marketing materials and content, except to the extent it is not legally possible to exclude such liability. If you require legal advice on your own situation, please contact us so we can discuss how we may assist

We’re here to support
your next step

Whatever that may be

Request a video call, phone call
or an in-person meeting

    Go Back